Archive for August, 2009

Letter to City Code Enforcement about our Pet Chickens

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

This is our response to the Greeley city code division. We have also contacted our representative in our ward.

Greeley City Code Enforcement

1000 10th Street

Greeley, CO 80631

This letter is in response to a courtesy warning of a city code violation we received on 8/14/2009 at our property  in Greeley.  We believe there is an error in the violation and that we are not out of compliance. The warning says that we need to reduce our number of chickens from four to one because of a code under land use for commercial livestock. It states the land size that we need to raise “chickens, broiler & layer; rabbits” (18.58.030). However, these chickens are not used for commercial purposes and we do not have an agricultural business or farm of any sort. These chickens, our girls, are simply our pets, and are not kept for “economic (business) reasons”.

 When we looked online for any restrictions on keeping pet chickens, we did not find any. In fact, we found that our girls would fall under pets as domesticated birds:

 7.04.097 Domesticated animal. Domesticated animal means a pet or companion animal that is kept by humans for companionship, amusement or for the beauty of its appearance or utterances, rather than for economic reasons. A domesticated animal may include, but is not limited to, dogs, cats, fish, parrots, doves, cockatiels, budgies, cockatoos, finches, macaws, any other domesticated birds (except wild birds), nonpoisonous snakes under six (6) feet in length, rodents (including hamsters, guinea pigs, mice, gerbils, chinchillas, degus, flying squirrels and rats), sugar gliders, rabbits, ferrets and pot-bellied pigs. (Ord. 8, 2006 §1).

 Rabbits (who are also listed under the 18.58.030 code as only allowing one per 1/10 acre), pigs (also under 18.58.030) and other animals listed above could be raised for either economic purposes or for pet purposes but are not restricted in number if they are pets. In our case, our girls, Henrietta, Salt, Football and Greenfoot, are raised as pets. There is no agricultural business involved and we are not breaking any animal code by responsibly raising them as such.

 Thank you for your time.

 Sincerely,

 Cassie and Britton Kauffman

A Fight for our Right to… Chickens?

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

White Chicken says what

Yep, that’s right. After the article in the paper came out about us and our chickens, we had a visit from the city Code Inspection office. Apparently we are only allowed to have ONE chicken because the code says you can only have one per 1/10 of an acre and we have .16 acres. That was not what we were initially told, but apparently that’s the case. No matter that we have an EMPTY FIELD behind our house. Or that there is a house on the other side of the fence with horses…no that would make too much sense to allow chickens in our backyard.

violation
The Chicken Ticket

So, now we are going to have to fight for our right to have chickens. Crazy. I wasn’t really even interested in this fight. I just wanted to be left alone, my property, my business. And get this, when I called the city to find out if we could get a variance for our chickens, they said it would be $300! It is considered a MAJOR variance. A major variance? For three little animals that weigh about 2 pounds each? And there are no guarantees that we would get it! And come to find out from this particular planner that there is NO limit to the number of dogs and cats a person can have as long as they aren’t breaking any other code violations like noise, smell, confinement rules, etc.

So compared to unlimited dogs or cats, having a few chicken hens doesn’t seem to hurt anyone. They are not noisy -the neighbors’ dogs are much noisier, they aren’t dirty -you can just spray the poop right off and it becomes fertilizer unlike dog poop, they don’t pose a threat to public safety as they can’t bite or kill anyone as dogs can. And each of these possibilities would already be covered by existing codes as they are for dogs and other pets.

Keeping chickens as pets has the additional benefit of food production and food security. I can’t see why anyone would think that having four backyard chickens is detrimental to society. If you support local food, environmental and economic sustainability, food security, healthy lifestyles and responsible pet ownership, please support us in being allowed to live in Greeley with our chickens.

We are going to fight this and we will need your help. If you are in the Greeley or northern Colorado area, we will be meeting next Thursday, August 20, 2009 at Ramseier Farm Park, 6:30pm to talk strategy. Please come if you can.

Colorado and Puerto Rico State Quarters

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

2009-Puerto-Rico    Proof-Colorado

We’ve seen quite a few Colorado quarters since we have the Denver Mint right near here, but I recently ran across a Puerto Rico “state” quarter. I was holding it upside down and said to Britton, “Wow, this quarter looks like Puerto Rico”. I had no idea that they had made a quarter for it. I thought the design was pretty cool. The first thing that ran through my mind was, “Is Puerto Rico going to become a state?” since I thought these quarters were only for states.

But apparently, it is also for districts like Washington D.C. and the territories as well, although I haven’t seen any other quarters for territories such as the US Virgin Islands, Guam or any of the other outlying islands but they supposedly exist. If Puerto Rico were to become a state, it would change a lot of things about it. Some for the better and some for the worse.

According to an article on the Puerto Rico quarter it has one of the fewest mintings ever for a quarter which also made it seem extra special and rare.

Chicken Press Coverage

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

UPDATE. Link to article:
We’re on the front page of the Greeley Tribune Sunday Edition in an article entitled Chicken Out (click on hyperlink to see)!

White and Brown Backyard Chickens
Chickens in the paper and with the paper

On Wednesday afternoon I received a phone call from a Greeley Tribune reporter. He asked if I would be willing to talk about our backyard chickens. I said sure as long as we wouldn’t get in trouble for having them. He said that wasn’t the intent of the story but that the City Council is considering changing the codes for chickens in the city limits. I am not sure if they want to make them more strict or less strict. We have not had any problems with our chickens and I think they knew I would be willing to talk about them because I wrote a blog for their website that they published in the hard copy.

Green Foot Chicken
The Americana AKA Greenfoot

He asked me what some of the benefits to having chickens were and if we have had any problems. The benefits I mentioned were:
-Farm fresh eggs with huge healthy yolks
- Bug Abatement
- Free fertilizer! :-)
- Local food = fewer caged chickens
- They eat our kitchen scraps, so less waste in the garbage.
- Fun and easy to care for pets
-A great, hands-on learning experience
-Becoming more self-sufficient and self-reliant
- A personal step -along with our garden- towards decentralizing our food system

As far as problems, I just mentioned that one of our chickens died and that was sad, but it was what made us get the chicks which was such a fun experience. He asked about predators and I told him about the hawks and foxes around but that we’ve never had any issues. Neighborhood cats seem to leave them alone for the most part and Kitty and Schnoodle get along great with them.

He also asked if we had an increase in mice because of them. I said that ever since Kitty has been living outside we’ve had fewer mice problems (since he became a sort-of mouser) and that mice are always going to be somewhat of an issue with an open field behind our house (that’s why they’re called field mice!).

He also asked if we had checked the regulations, which we had. I talked with a city planner about a year ago who thought we would have no problems as long as we didn’t get a rooster. We checked our HOA rules and as long as we call them our pets they are fine as well.

Then he set up a time for a photographer to come over and take our picture. We picked last night at 7pm. It was so weird having this huge camera lens right up in our faces while we either chased the chickens around our yard, fed them, held them or just sat next to them. I wonder how the pictures will turn out. The photographer said she thought it would be printed this week some time.
We’ll see! It was pretty fun and exciting anyway. You never know what kind of fallout will happen when you have press coverage though! But you heard it here first! :-)

Anniversary!

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

UPDATE: Cassie’s surprise edible bouquet

Edible Bouquet

Today is our 4th year wedding anniversary! We’ve been having an adventure every day.

What I have said before  stands true: The journey is the destination! We’ve done so many fun and interesting things together and there is not going to be a shortage of that any time soon. When we got married we took our honeymoon to Puerto Rico and have wanted to live there ever since, but each day has been an adventure wherever we are.

When I get home I’ll update the post with some pictures of the first trip to PR. Here is a picture from our latest trip we took this February 2009.
Anniversary

We have plans to celebrate on Saturday and are both stuck at work today. Cassie, if you are reading this you should have a surprise soon!